Taylor v. Obama

487 F. App'x 831
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 15, 2012
DocketNo. 12-2110
StatusPublished

This text of 487 F. App'x 831 (Taylor v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Obama, 487 F. App'x 831 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Emanuel Taylor seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice for failure to state a claim his amended complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Taylor does not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 F. App'x 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-obama-ca4-2012.