Taylor v. Obama

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2009
Docket09-1649
StatusUnpublished

This text of Taylor v. Obama (Taylor v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Obama, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1649

ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BARACK OBAMA,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00254-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eric Emmanuel Taylor appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2006). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Obama, No.

2:09-cv-00254-RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. June 3, 2009). We also deny as

moot Taylor’s motions to expedite and for oral argument. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taylor v. Obama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-obama-ca4-2009.