Taylor v. Obama
This text of Taylor v. Obama (Taylor v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1649
ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BARACK OBAMA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00254-RAJ-JEB)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eric Emmanuel Taylor appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Obama, No.
2:09-cv-00254-RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. June 3, 2009). We also deny as
moot Taylor’s motions to expedite and for oral argument. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taylor v. Obama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-obama-ca4-2009.