Taylor v. NYC
This text of Taylor v. NYC (Taylor v. NYC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: ROY TAYLOR. ee DATE FILED: _ 2/29/2024 _ Plaintiff, 20-cv-5036 (MK V) -against- ORDER NYC etal., Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of Defendant’s letter requesting leave to file a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s operative pleading [ECF Nos. 88, 89]. The Court is also in receipt of Plaintiff’s letter opposing dismissal [ECF No. 91] and his letter, addressed to the Chief Judge, requesting my recusal [ECF No. 90]. There is no basis for my recusal in this case because there is no reason to question my impartiality. See In re Aguinda, 241 F.3d 194, 201 (2d Cir. 2001). This Court has “no personal bias concerning the outcome of the case,” nor does the Court have a “personal or fiduciary interest in the outcome of the case.” United States v. Lovaglia, 954 F.2d 811, 815 (2d Cir. 1992). The Court will continue to preside over this case fairly and impartially. Accordingly, with respect to Defendant’s contemplated motion to dismiss, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall file its motion by March 14, 2024. Plaintiff shall respond by April 29, 2024. Any reply is due May 6, 2024. The Clerk of Court respectfully is requested to terminate docket entry 89 and mail Plaintiff this Order. SO ORDERED. | Lys (/ Date: February 29, 2024 MARY (WsgAY OC New York, NY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taylor v. NYC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-nyc-nysd-2024.