Taylor v. Nobles

Supreme Court of Florida

Taylor v. Nobles

173 So. 908, 131 Fla. 248, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1048

DecidedApril 26, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 173 So. 908 (Taylor v. Nobles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Nobles, 173 So. 908, 131 Fla. 248, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1048 (Fla. 1937).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the transcript of the record, which has been duly inspected, the Court is of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the judgment brought before us by this writ of error should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur. Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the transcript of the record, which has been duly inspected, the Court is of the opinion that no reversible error appears and that the judgment brought before us by this writ of error should be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell and Brown, J. J., concur. Buford, and Davis, J. J., concur specially.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 So. 908, 131 Fla. 248, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 1048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-nobles-fla-1937.