Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority

266 A.D.2d 384, 698 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11531
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 266 A.D.2d 384 (Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. New York City Transit Authority, 266 A.D.2d 384, 698 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated May 1, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On March 2, 1994, the plaintiff was injured when she allegedly slipped and fell, on an ice- and snow-covered stairway while descending into the subway station at 75th Street in Jackson Heights, Queens, during a snow and ice storm. The plaintiff claims that she slipped on old ice from a previous snowstorm.

A party in control of real property may be held liable for a hazardous condition created on its premises because of the accumulation of snow or ice only if it had a reasonably sufficient time from the cessation of the precipitation to remedy the condition (see, Simmons v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 972; Mangieri v Prime Hospitality Corp., 251 AD2d 632; Wall v Village of Mineola, 237 AD2d 511). A defendant cannot be held liable for an injury caused by a storm which was in progress at the time of the injury.

Based upon the record, there is simply no proof that ice from a prior storm remained in the particular area where the plaintiff fell at the time of the accident or that old ice caused her fall (cf., Granato v Bella Vista Group Assocs., 239 AD2d 781). As it would be pure speculation that preexisting ice caused the plaintiffs fall, it was error to deny the defendant’s [385]*385motion. Krausman, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Christ's First Presbyterian Church
93 A.D.3d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Sfakianos v. Big Six Towers, Inc.
46 A.D.3d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Powell v. Cedar Manor Mutual Housing Corp.
45 A.D.3d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Evans v. MTA/New York City Transit Authority
41 A.D.3d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Small v. Coney Island Site 4A-1 Houses, Inc.
28 A.D.3d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Rapone v. Di-Gara Realty Corp.
22 A.D.3d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Dowden v. Long Island Rail Road
305 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Palopoli v. City of New York
305 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Pelliccio v. TCW Realty Fund Via Holding Co.
291 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Burgos v. City of New York
289 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Hill-Thomas v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
289 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gibbs v. Rochdale Village, Inc.
282 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Trainor v. Dayton Seaside Associates No. 3
282 A.D.2d 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gadonniex v. Lombardi
277 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Lamolly v. Mobile Veterinary Tenant Unit Enterprises
276 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 384, 698 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1999.