Taylor v. Nevada Gas Co., Limited

28 P.2d 134, 55 Nev. 329, 1933 Nev. LEXIS 43
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 27, 1933
Docket3033
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 P.2d 134 (Taylor v. Nevada Gas Co., Limited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Nevada Gas Co., Limited, 28 P.2d 134, 55 Nev. 329, 1933 Nev. LEXIS 43 (Neb. 1933).

Opinion

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

This is a motion to strike the transcript of record on appeal.

The four grounds upon which the motion was made are set out in the notice of motion. It is unnecessary to state them in detail. None furnishes a reason for granting the motion. The record on appeal before us, consisting of a certified copy of the judgment roll, the order denying the motion for a new trial, the notice of appeal and undertaking on appeal, and bill of exceptions duly served, filed, and certified, is complete. It is carefully prepared and arranged in an orderly manner in accordance with the rules of this court. The appeal was duly perfected, and the transcript of the record on appeal was served on respondent’s counsel, and filed within the time required by rule 2 of the rules of the supreme court.

The motion to strike the transcript of the record on appeal must be denied, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Flickinger v. Nevada Gas Company
28 P.2d 134 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 P.2d 134, 55 Nev. 329, 1933 Nev. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-nevada-gas-co-limited-nev-1933.