Taylor v. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

Fourth Circuit

Taylor v. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

474 F. App'x 272

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2012·No. Nos. 12-1315, 12-1383·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Erica D. Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous her civil suits. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Nat’l Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, No. 1:12-cv-00457-RDB (D.Md., Feb. 21, 2012); Taylor v. Roennenburg, No., 1:12-cv-00469-RDB (D.Md. Feb. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Erica D. Taylor appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous her civil suits. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Nat’l Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, No. 1:12-cv-00457-RDB (D.Md., Feb. 21, 2012); Taylor v. Roennenburg, No., 1:12-cv-00469-RDB (D.Md. Feb. 21, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Taylor v. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, 474 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 272 (Taylor v. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.