Taylor v. National Cash Register Co.
68 S.E. 1009, 8 Ga. App. 283, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 130
Opinion
Under the ruling in Conder v. Eolleman, 71 Qa. 93, it was error to decline to allow the claimant to prove that the indebtedness of' the defendant in attachment to the plaintiff arose before the date of the conditional sale and the claimant’s reservation of title; and for this reason, if for no other, the judge of the superior court properly sustained the certiorari. . Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. National Cash Register Co., 68 S.E. 1009, 8 Ga. App. 283, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
68 S.E. 1009 (Taylor v. National Cash Register Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tremere v. Barfield
78 S.E. 729 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
American Law Book Co. v. Brunswick Crosstie & Creosoting Co.
77 S.E. 104 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)