Taylor v. National Cash Register Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Taylor v. National Cash Register Co.

68 S.E. 1009, 8 Ga. App. 283, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 130

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 20, 1910

Docket2646

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 1009 (Taylor v. National Cash Register Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. National Cash Register Co., 68 S.E. 1009, 8 Ga. App. 283, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 130 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

Under the ruling in Conder v. Eolleman, 71 Qa. 93, it was error to decline to allow the claimant to prove that the indebtedness of' the defendant in attachment to the plaintiff arose before the date of the conditional sale and the claimant’s reservation of title; and for this reason, if for no other, the judge of the superior court properly sustained the certiorari. . Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

Under the ruling in Conder v. Eolleman, 71 Qa. 93, it was error to decline to allow the claimant to prove that the indebtedness of' the defendant in attachment to the plaintiff arose before the date of the conditional sale and the claimant’s reservation of title; and for this reason, if for no other, the judge of the superior court properly sustained the certiorari. . Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 S.E. 1009, 8 Ga. App. 283, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-national-cash-register-co-gactapp-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack