Taylor v. Nagy
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
CHARLES ROBERT TAYLOR,
Petitioner, Case No. 19-cv-11067 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v.
KIM CARGOR,1
Respondent. _______________________________________________________________________/ JUDGMENT The above entitled came before the Court on a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. In accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on April 17, 2023: (1) The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. (2) A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (3) Petitioner is granted leave to appeal In Forma Pauperis. KINIKIA ESSIX CLERK OF COURT
By: s/Holly A. Ryan Deputy Clerk
Approved:
s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN Dated: April 17, 2023 United States District Judge Detroit, Michigan
1 The caption is amended to reflect the proper respondent in this case, the warden of the prison where Petitioner is currently incarcerated. See Edwards v. Johns, 450 F. Supp. 2d 755, 757 (E.D. Mich. 2006); see also Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rule 2(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Nagy (Taylor v. Nagy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.