Taylor v. Mull

311 So. 2d 435, 54 Ala. App. 611, 1975 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 616
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedApril 16, 1975
DocketCiv. 539
StatusPublished

This text of 311 So. 2d 435 (Taylor v. Mull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Mull, 311 So. 2d 435, 54 Ala. App. 611, 1975 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 616 (Ala. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

Motion to quash service of summons and complaint was granted by the trial court. Plaintiff appealed.

Appeal does not lie from an order granting a motion to quash service. Lee v. Wright Tool & Forge Company, 291 Ala. 420, 282 So.2d 248; Ex parte: Emerson, 270 Ala. 697, 121 So.2d 914. Appeal must be dismissed ex mero motu.

Appeal dismissed.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Emerson
121 So. 2d 914 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1960)
Lee v. Wright Tool Forge Company
282 So. 2d 248 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 So. 2d 435, 54 Ala. App. 611, 1975 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-mull-alacivapp-1975.