Taylor v. Medford

Fourth Circuit

Taylor v. Medford

89 F. App'x 399

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 10, 2004·No. No. 03-7603·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Freddie D. Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Medford, No. CA-03-202-1-02-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Freddie D. Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Medford, No. CA-03-202-1-02-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Taylor v. Medford, 89 F. App'x 399 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

89 F. App'x 399 (Taylor v. Medford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related