Taylor v. Means
77 S.E. 373, 139 Ga. 578, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 515
Opinion
The important principle ruled in the third headnote is not elaborated here, but a most elaborate and exhaustive discussion of the doctrine involved in that ruling will be found in 1 Wharton on Criminal Law (11th ed.), § 370 et seq., and the numerous cases cited as authority for the text. Besides, this matter is elaborately treated in the copious extracts from the decisions of many courts contained in the note to the case In re John Sharp, 18 L. B. A. (N. S.) 886 (15 Idaho, 120, 96 Pac. 563).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Means, 77 S.E. 373, 139 Ga. 578, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 515 (Ga. 1913).
77 S.E. 373 (Taylor v. Means) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bryan v. State
251 S.E.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Chatterton v. Dutton
154 S.E.2d 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Hampton v. Stevenson
78 S.E.2d 32 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Harris v. Alvis
104 N.E.2d 182 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)
Wissenburg v. Bradley
229 N.W. 205 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1929)
In Re Brady
157 N.E. 69 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)
State v. Klingenberger
149 N.E. 395 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1925)
In re Hosford
190 P. 765 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1920)