Taylor v. McNab

New York Court of Appeals

Taylor v. McNab

355 N.E.2d 789, 40 N.Y.2d 821, 387 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2991

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 2, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 355 N.E.2d 789 (Taylor v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. McNab, 355 N.E.2d 789, 40 N.Y.2d 821, 387 N.Y.S.2d 560, 1976 N.Y. LEXIS 2991 (N.Y. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having granted leave to appeal in this case in the accelerated procedure required in some election cases the court sua sponte has reconsidered such determination and on such reconsideration recalls its prior determination and denies the application for leave to appeal.

It now appears that the record in this case is insufficient to permit an informed judicial resolution of the important issues tendered for determination. Further, in view of the practical constraints of time before the primary elections on September 14, 1976, the court is satisfied that there can be no adequate [822]*822opportunity appropriately to supplement the record and to obtain a final judicial disposition.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in Per Curiam opinion.

On reconsideration, order granting leave to appeal recalled and motion for leave to appeal denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI