Taylor v. McKinley

California Supreme Court

Taylor v. McKinley

4 Cal. 104

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1854

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Cal. 104 (Taylor v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. McKinley, 4 Cal. 104 (Cal. 1854).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

This Court has always refused to interfere with the verdict of a jury, where the evidence is dubious or conflicting. Nor, in such case, will we revise the discretion of the Court below, in granting or refusing a new trial.

The assignments of error made in this case are too unsubstantial to require consideration or argument.

Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.

This Court has always refused to interfere with the verdict of a jury, where the evidence is dubious or conflicting. Nor, in such case, will we revise the discretion of the Court below, in granting or refusing a new trial.

The assignments of error made in this case are too unsubstantial to require consideration or argument.

Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cal. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-mckinley-cal-1854.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack