Taylor v. McKinley
4 Cal. 104
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This Court has always refused to interfere with the verdict of a jury, where the evidence is dubious or conflicting. Nor, in such case, will we revise the discretion of the Court below, in granting or refusing a new trial.
The assignments of error made in this case are too unsubstantial to require consideration or argument.
Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. McKinley, 4 Cal. 104 (Cal. 1854).
4 Cal. 104 (Taylor v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kellenberger v. Market Street Cable Railway Co.
33 P. 90 (California Supreme Court, 1893)