Taylor v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Taylor v. McDonough

958 So. 2d 1107, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9567, 2007 WL 1772111

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 2007·No. No. 1D06-0363·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee has conceded that under Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003), the circuit court erred in ordering a lien on the appellant’s inmate trust account for filing fees associated with his petition for writ of mandamus challenging his award of basic gain time. The denial of the motion to vacate the lien is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions to vacate the lien.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellee has conceded that under Schmidt v. Crusoe, 878 So.2d 361 (Fla.2003), the circuit court erred in ordering a lien on the appellant’s inmate trust account for filing fees associated with his petition for writ of mandamus challenging his award of basic gain time. The denial of the motion to vacate the lien is therefore REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the trial court with instructions to vacate the lien.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Taylor v. McDonough, 958 So. 2d 1107, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9567, 2007 WL 1772111 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

958 So. 2d 1107 (Taylor v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related