Taylor v. Mathis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Taylor v. Mathis

128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 58, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 34

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 14, 1925

Docket16317

StatusPublished

This text of 128 S.E. 16 (Taylor v. Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Mathis, 128 S.E. 16, 34 Ga. App. 58, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 34 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial are merely in elaboration of the general grounds.

[59]*59Decided May 14, 1925. Hendricks & Hendricks, for plaintiff in error. Dewey Knight, contra.

2. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error for the award of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI