Taylor v. Marshal

14 Johns. 204
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1817
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 Johns. 204 (Taylor v. Marshal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Marshal, 14 Johns. 204 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case is imperfect in not stating whether the cattle were in Ward's possession or not, when taken on the execution; nor whether the conversation proved by Marshal, was before, or after, the levying the execution on the oxen.

We think, however, there is enough to show, that the evidence was improper, and that it may fairly be intended, that the was after the judgment and execution; it was an to prove and set up an antecedent sale, by the confessions and declarations of the parties, to the prejudice of the rights of a third person; nothing but the fact of the sale, derived from witnesses present at it, could be legally proved.

Judgment

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe, on the Demise of Maxwell v. Moore
4 Blackf. 445 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1837)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Johns. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-marshal-nysupct-1817.