Taylor v. Markus
224 A.D. 865
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant Umans to dismiss amended complaint as against him reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The action is brought for rescission; and while plaintiff may have an action at law against defendant Umans for damages, he may not maintain the action for rescission, because Umans was not a party to the contract. (Ritzwoller v. Lurie, 225 N. Y. 464.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Taylor v. Markus, 224 A.D. 865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).
224 A.D. 865 (Taylor v. Markus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Josovich v. Ceylan
133 A.D.3d 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)