Taylor v. Marion County Detention Center
Opinion
Eddie Lee Taylor appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Marion County Detention Ctn, No. CA-01-4118-9 (D.S.C. July 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
53 F. App'x 278 (Taylor v. Marion County Detention Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.