Taylor v. Loomis

43 A. 180, 21 R.I. 277, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 45
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedApril 24, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 43 A. 180 (Taylor v. Loomis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Loomis, 43 A. 180, 21 R.I. 277, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 45 (R.I. 1899).

Opinion

Tillinghast, J.

(1) This case is not properly before us. It was brought in the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District. The defendant demurred to the declaration, and the court, upon hearing, overruled the demurrer, whereupon the defendant filed exceptions, and the case was certified to this court for trial on the exceptions. This was error. The demurrer having been overruled in the District Court, the case should have proceeded to trial and decision on the merits, and then, if either party was aggrieved, the statute provides the proceedings to be had in order to remove the case to this *278 court. Gen. Laws R. I. cap. 250, §§ 12-18. These proceedings, in so far as they relate to taking questions of law to this court, are substantially similar to those contained in Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 220, § 13, for the taking of questions of law, arising in special court actions, to the Supreme Court. And it was the uniform practice under that statute to dispose of the case on its merits in the special court before allowing a bill of exceptions. If the demurrer in the case before us had been sustained and exceptions taken by the plaintiff, then, as there would have been nothing further for the court to do, the case could properly have been certified here for review. But as it has not yet been disposed of in the District Court by a trial and decision on the merits, it must be remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Irving CTiamplin, for plaintiff. William Q. Rich, for defendant.

Case remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penington v. Commonwealth Hotel Construction Corp.
155 A. 514 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 A. 180, 21 R.I. 277, 1899 R.I. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-loomis-ri-1899.