Taylor v. Lee Chevrolet, Inc.

376 So. 2d 474, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16069
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 1979
DocketNo. OO-304
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 376 So. 2d 474 (Taylor v. Lee Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Lee Chevrolet, Inc., 376 So. 2d 474, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16069 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lawrence M. Taylor, seeks review of two circuit court orders by petition for common law certiorari. The first order, striking petitioner’s claim for punitive damages, is not reviewable because the petition was filed nearly a year after the order was rendered. Fla.R.App.P. 9.100(c). The second order, transferring the remaining claim for compensatory damages to county court, was proper because the allegations in the complaint did not in good faith support the sum demanded or actually placed in [475]*475controversy.1 See Anderson v. Burwell Motor Company, 73 So.2d 822 (Fla.1954) and Mendoza v. Farrell, 199 So.2d 750 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967).

The petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED.

MILLS, C. J., and ERVIN and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Miami v. Cosgrove
516 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 So. 2d 474, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-lee-chevrolet-inc-fladistctapp-1979.