Taylor v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Taylor v. King

163 A.D. 868, 147 N.Y.S. 1145

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 868 (Taylor v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. King, 163 A.D. 868, 147 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

There was no laches shown which should deprive the defendant of a bill of particulars. (Tilton v. Gans, 155 App. Div. 612.) The allegations of the complaint as to the nature of the contract and the damages recoverable were such as to entitle the defendant to a bill of particulars under appropriate conditions. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for a bill of particulars granted, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapletonand Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There was no laches shown which should deprive the defendant of a bill of particulars. (Tilton v. Gans, 155 App. Div. 612.) The allegations of the complaint as to the nature of the contract and the damages recoverable were such as to entitle the defendant to a bill of particulars under appropriate conditions. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for a bill of particulars granted, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapletonand Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 868, 147 N.Y.S. 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-king-nyappdiv-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack