Taylor v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Taylor v. Kelly

8 Ark. 101

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 15, 1852·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is within the principle enforced in the case of Denning v. Kelly, 4 Eng. 435. The defendant having pleaded a plea of a subsequent order or division, lost the privilege of all pleas comprehended in any prior order or division. The motion to strike it out ought to have been granted.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is within the principle enforced in the case of Denning v. Kelly, 4 Eng. 435. The defendant having pleaded a plea of a subsequent order or division, lost the privilege of all pleas comprehended in any prior order or division. The motion to strike it out ought to have been granted.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Taylor v. Kelly, 8 Ark. 101 (Ark. 1852).

Pincite

8 Ark. 101 (Taylor v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.