Taylor v. Karimi

District Court, S.D. Illinois·Decided January 7, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-01301·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

KENNADO TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIVIL NO. 19-1301-NJR ) KARIMI, et al ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ROSENSTENGEL, Chief Judge: On December 9, 2019, Taylor’s motion for leave to proceed in form pauperis (“IFP”) was denied as he has “struck out” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and did not meet the requirements of the imminent danger exception (Doc. 6). Taylor was ordered to pay the filing fee of $400.00 on or before December 30, 2019 and was warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the action. Id. To date, Taylor has failed to pay the filing fee. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 7, 2020 s/ NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL Chief U.S. District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Karimi, (S.D. Ill. 2020).

Taylor v. Karimi (Taylor v. Karimi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related