Taylor v. Jordan

195 S.E. 186, 185 Ga. 325, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 438
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1938
DocketNo. 12060
StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.E. 186 (Taylor v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Jordan, 195 S.E. 186, 185 Ga. 325, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 438 (Ga. 1938).

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

A judgment for a sum of money was recovered in tlie municipal court of Atlanta, and thereafter the defendant instituted a suit against the plaintiff in the same court and recovered a judgment for a larger amount. The plaintiff in the second suit desired to set off his judgment against the first judgment, but on the date of its rendition the plaintiff in the first judgment formally transferred for value his interest therein to a third person. Execution based thereon was levied, and garnishment was served. An affidavit of illegality was interposed. An equitable suit was brought by the defendant named in the first judgment, against the plaintiff and his transferee, his attorney, and the levying officer, to enjoin all the proceedings in the municipal court and to consolidate them in the one action in the superior court, and to cancel the transfer on the ground of fraud, so [326]*326that the judgment might be credited by way of set off against the second judgment, and to avoid multiplicity of actions. The evidence at interlocutory hearing demanded a finding in favor of validity of the transfer. The evidence being of such character on that controlling question, the judge did not err in refusing to enjoin the proceedings in the municipal court. Even though the municipal court of Atlanta would not have jurisdiction to cancel the contract of transfer on the ground of fraud, the proceedings in that court should not be enjoined upon evidence in the suit for injunction which shows that there was no fraud. Judgment affirmed.

No. 12060. January 11, 1938. All the Justices concur. Willidm A. Thomas, for plaintiffs. Lawton Halley, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.E. 186, 185 Ga. 325, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-jordan-ga-1938.