Taylor v. Jones

W.D. Louisiana

Taylor v. Jones

DecidedJanuary 9, 2025

Docket3:22-cv-05210

StatusUnknown

This text of Taylor v. Jones (Taylor v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Jones, (W.D. La. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

ROBERT PAUL TAYLOR CIVIL DOCKET NO. 3:22-CV-05210

VERSUS JUDGE DAVID C. JOSEPH

RICKY JONES, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. 75] of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, noting the absence of objections having been filed, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge’s findings under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 64] filed by Defendants, Sheriff Rickey Jones, Pat W. Smith, Nolan Bass, Nurse Frazier, and Nurse Harvey is GRANTED IN PART, and that Plaintiff, Robert Paul Taylor’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 related to his postponed August 31, 2021 medical appointment asserted against Defendants, Pat W. Smith, Nolan Bass, Nurse Frazier, and Nurse Harvey are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 64] otherwise is DENIED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D. McClusky to conduct an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Flowers v. Phelps, 956 F.2d 488 (5th Cir.), modified in part on other grounds, 964 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1992), and submit a Report and Recommendation to the Court. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 9‘ day of January 2025. Chad C DAVID C. JOSEPH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

ROBERT PAUL TAYLOR CIVIL DOCKET NO. 3:22-CV-05210

VERSUS JUDGE DAVID C. JOSEPH

RICKY JONES, ET AL. MAG. JUDGE KAYLA D. MCCLUSKY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. 75] of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, noting the absence of objections having been filed, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge’s findings under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 64] filed by Defendants, Sheriff Rickey Jones, Pat W. Smith, Nolan Bass, Nurse Frazier, and Nurse Harvey is GRANTED IN PART, and that Plaintiff, Robert Paul Taylor’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 related to his postponed August 31, 2021 medical appointment asserted against Defendants, Pat W. Smith, Nolan Bass, Nurse Frazier, and Nurse Harvey are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. 64] otherwise is DENIED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Kayla D. McClusky to conduct an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Flowers v. Phelps, 956 F.2d 488 (5th Cir.), modified in part on other grounds, 964 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1992), and submit a Report and Recommendation to the Court. THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 9‘ day of January 2025. Chad C DAVID C. JOSEPH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Taylor v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-jones-lawd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack