Taylor v. INS
This text of Taylor v. INS (Taylor v. INS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Taylor v. INS, (1st Cir. 1994).
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
February 11, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 93-1776
MAXWELL M. TAYLOR,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
CHARLES T. COBB, DISTRICT DIRECTOR,
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent, Appellee.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________
___________________
Maxwell M. Taylor, on brief pro se.
_________________
A. John Pappalardo, United States Attorney, and Naomi G.
___________________ _________
Litvin, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Department of
______
Justice, Immigration & Naturalization Service, on brief for
appellee.
__________________
__________________
Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs
___________
and the record on appeal. We find no error in the district
court's denial of the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
The Attorney General has six months from the date of the
final administrative order of deportation, or, if judicial
review is sought (such as was the case here), six months from
the date of final order of this court, to effect deportation.
8 U.S.C. 1252(c). That period had not expired at the time
of Taylor's habeas petition. Indeed, it has not yet
commenced to run.
Affirmed.
_________
-3-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Taylor v. INS, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-ins-ca1-1994.