Taylor v. Hutchinson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Taylor v. Hutchinson

3 N.J.L. 952

DecidedMay 15, 1812

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 952 (Taylor v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Hutchinson, 3 N.J.L. 952 (N.J. 1812).

Pincite

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J. and Pennington, J.

— Were clearly of opinion, that the action could not be sustained. The board, washing, &c. furnished the [*] boy, was furnished him as an apprentice, and while the boy was serving the master as an apprentice; that if he had any remedy against the father, it must be on the contract. It did not appear that the father contracted to pay the board of the boy, and the nature of the transaction repelled the idea.

Ross urn, J.. — Doubted.

Judgment reversed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick, C. J. and Pennington, J.

— Were clearly of opinion, that the action could not be sustained. The board, washing, &c. furnished the [*] boy, was furnished him as an apprentice, and while the boy was serving the master as an apprentice; that if he had any remedy against the father, it must be on the contract. It did not appear that the father contracted to pay the board of the boy, and the nature of the transaction repelled the idea.

Ross urn, J.. — Doubted.

Judgment reversed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-hutchinson-nj-1812.