Taylor v. Hollingsworth

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2008
Docket08-6128
StatusUnpublished

This text of Taylor v. Hollingsworth (Taylor v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Hollingsworth, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6128

MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

LISA HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00970-DKC)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton Joseph Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Milton Joseph Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Taylor v. Hollingsworth, No. 8:07-cv-00970-DKC

(D. Md. Oct. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Taylor v. Hollingsworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-hollingsworth-ca4-2008.