Taylor v. Hollingsworth
This text of Taylor v. Hollingsworth (Taylor v. Hollingsworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6128
MILTON JOSEPH TAYLOR,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LISA HOLLINGSWORTH, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:07-cv-00970-DKC)
Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton Joseph Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Milton Joseph Taylor, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Taylor v. Hollingsworth, No. 8:07-cv-00970-DKC
(D. Md. Oct. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Taylor v. Hollingsworth, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-hollingsworth-ca4-2008.