Taylor v. Hillborough DOC

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided January 31, 1994·No. 93-1788·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


January 31, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 93-1788

MAXWELL M. TAYLOR,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

__________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]

___________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________

___________________

Maxwell M. Taylor on brief pro se.
_________________
Carolyn M. Kirby, Assistant County Attorney, on brief for
_________________
appellees.

__________________

__________________

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the briefs and the record
__________

below. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation, dated June 30,

1993, which was adopted by the district court in an order

dated July 13, 1993, judgment entering July 14, 1993.

Affirmed.
________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Hillborough DOC, (1st Cir. 1994).

Taylor v. Hillborough DOC (Taylor v. Hillborough DOC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.