Taylor v. Hahle
This text of 2 N.J. Misc. 593 (Taylor v. Hahle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
I am unable to advise a decree in favor of the complainant, lie has offered to pay for the houses in cash, and eliminate the question of whether the heaters installed by him were of sufficient capacity. The properties, however, are in the possession of others by virtue of agreements to purchase, made prior to the filing of the bill.
The complainant is eni itled, however, to payment for work done by him upon the property, and a reference will be made to a master for this purpose. Leave to amend, if found necessary, may be applied for.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.J. Misc. 593, 1924 N.J. Ch. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-hahle-njch-1924.