Taylor v. Gregg

Texas Supreme Court

Taylor v. Gregg

22 Tex. 317

DecidedJuly 1, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 22 Tex. 317 (Taylor v. Gregg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Gregg, 22 Tex. 317 (Tex. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Roberts, J.

There was a plea in abatement overruled, and afterwards a plea to the merits, and a confession of judgment with a stay of execution. The ruling of the court on the plea in abatement was excepted to, and is now assigned as error. The confession of judgment waived the errors, if any, in the precedent action of the court; and the judgment, having been rendered in pursuance to the terms of the agreement of the parties, filed in court, it must be held to be conclusive. (Hart. Dig. Art. 771.) Judgment is afiirmed with damages.

Affirmed with damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roberts, J.

There was a plea in abatement overruled, and afterwards a plea to the merits, and a confession of judgment with a stay of execution. The ruling of the court on the plea in abatement was excepted to, and is now assigned as error. The confession of judgment waived the errors, if any, in the precedent action of the court; and the judgment, having been rendered in pursuance to the terms of the agreement of the parties, filed in court, it must be held to be conclusive. (Hart. Dig. Art. 771.) Judgment is afiirmed with damages.

Affirmed with damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Tex. 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-gregg-tex-1858.