Taylor v. Graham
This text of 15 La. Ann. 418 (Taylor v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant is sought to be made responsible, as a notary, by reason of his negligence in omitting to give notice of the protest of a draft, to one of the drawers and endorsers.
The draft was protested on the 27th day of January, 1858, and on the same [419]*419day the draft and copy of protest were returned to the plaintiffs, and the notice of protest to the other drawers and endorsers was also submitted to them.
This suit was instituted on the 7th of October, 1859.
The defendant opposes the prescription of one year.
This action is based on the Article 2295 of the Civil Code, and, under Article 3501, falls under the prescription of one year.
The fact that the plaintiffs, who had all the means of knowledge, did not see fit to examine the protest and notice of protest, could not suspend the precription. The District Judge sustained, and we think correctly, the plea of prescription.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. Ann. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-graham-la-1860.