Taylor v. . Grace

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Taylor v. . Grace

6 N.C. 66

DecidedJuly 5, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.C. 66 (Taylor v. . Grace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. . Grace, 6 N.C. 66 (N.C. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

On demand, I promise to pay or cause to be paid unto John Taylor, his heirs or order, the sum of £ 56 12s., specie, with lawful interest till paid, it being for value received, as witness my hand and seal, this 27 July, 1796.

JAMES GRACE. (SEAL.)

James Grace having died, Taylor brought an action of debt on this bond against the defendants, who were his heirs at law; and upon the trial the presiding judge nonsuited the plaintiff, on the ground that the obligor had not bound his heirs to pay the debt. There can be no doubt upon this point. The nonsuit was regular and must stand.

(67)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On demand, I promise to pay or cause to be paid unto John Taylor, his heirs or order, the sum of £ 56 12s., specie, with lawful interest till paid, it being for value received, as witness my hand and seal, this 27 July, 1796.

JAMES GRACE. (SEAL.)

James Grace having died, Taylor brought an action of debt on this bond against the defendants, who were his heirs at law; and upon the trial the presiding judge nonsuited the plaintiff, on the ground that the obligor had not bound his heirs to pay the debt. There can be no doubt upon this point. The nonsuit was regular and must stand.

(67)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.C. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-grace-nc-1811.