Taylor v. Fulmer-Orlando

528 So. 2d 1224, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1592, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2960, 1988 WL 70562
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 8, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1360
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 So. 2d 1224 (Taylor v. Fulmer-Orlando) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Fulmer-Orlando, 528 So. 2d 1224, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1592, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2960, 1988 WL 70562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

The claimant in this workers’ compensation case appeals the sufficiency of a 1987 order awarding $12,500 in attorney’s fees based on the employer/carrier’s (E/C’s) bad faith failure to accept the claimant as permanently and totally disabled (PTD). The employer/carrier cross-appeal the deputy commissioner’s underlying finding of bad faith.

[1225]*1225We affirm the issue on cross appeal, finding there to be competent and substantial evidence in the record to support the deputy’s finding that the E/C’s failure to accept the claimant as PTD prior to the January 3, 1984 hearing on PTD benefits amounted to bad faith. Burnup & Sims, Inc. v. Ozment, 440 So.2d 29 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). However, we reverse that portion of the order determining the amount of attorney’s fees, based on the deputy’s failure to determine the amount of benefits secured by the claimant’s attorney, section 440.34(1), Florida Statutes; School Board of Collier County v. Salter, 457 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), and his failure to expressly consider the guidelines and factors set out in section 440.34(l)(a)-(h), Florida Statutes. Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. Coleman, 458 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); AT & T Technologies, Inc. v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); W.A. Doss & Sons, Inc. v. Barbato, 487 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Accordingly, we affirm the deputy’s finding of bad faith, reverse the amount of attorney’s fees awarded, and remand for reconsideration in light of the factors required under the statute and case law.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

MILLS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Renfroe
568 So. 2d 962 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 So. 2d 1224, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1592, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2960, 1988 WL 70562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-fulmer-orlando-fladistctapp-1988.