Taylor v. Frazer

Fourth Circuit

Taylor v. Frazer

42 F. App'x 651

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2002·No. No. 02-1545·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A. Corwin Taylor appeals the district court’s orders adopting the two reports and recommendation of the magistrate judge and finally dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Frazer, No. CA-01-680-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 25, 2002, May 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument and deny Taylor’s pending motion for the appointment of counsel because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

A. Corwin Taylor appeals the district court’s orders adopting the two reports and recommendation of the magistrate judge and finally dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Frazer, No. CA-01-680-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 25, 2002, May 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument and deny Taylor’s pending motion for the appointment of counsel because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Taylor v. Frazer, 42 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 651 (Taylor v. Frazer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.