Taylor v. Foote's Administrators

1 Wright 356
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1883·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

These notes, though not negotiable at law, so as to confer upon the assignee a right to sue in his own name, are held in equity as negotiated. The lien for the purchase money is a right of the vendor, and cannot pass into other hands as an incident to the obligation, or the land, if conveyed by the vendor; Jackman v. Hallock, 1 O. 319; and Tiernan v. Beane, 2 O. 383, are conclusive on this point; so is Williams v. Roberts, 5 O. 35.

The bill is dismissed.

[Vendor’s lien is valid without a decree; Martin v. Johnson, 7 O. 1st pt. 225, 226.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Foote's Administrators, 1 Wright 356 (Ohio 1883).

1 Wright 356 (Taylor v. Foote's Administrators) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salem Water Co. v. City of Salem
5 Or. 29 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1873)