Taylor v. Escandon

50 Cal. 428
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1875
DocketNo. 4199
StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cal. 428 (Taylor v. Escandon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Escandon, 50 Cal. 428 (Cal. 1875).

Opinion

By the Court:

1. The plaintiff’s title is a grant issued by the Mexican government in California, in March, 1846, and a final confirmation, survey and patent, issued thereon by the government of the United States, pursuant to the provisions of the act of Congress of March 3, 1851, to settle private land claims in the State of California. The answer admits that the defendants are in possession of the premises sued for.

2. The only defense relied upon is based upon an alleged grant issued by the Mexican government in California in 1845 to Juan Jesus and Jose Gabriel, granting to them a portion of the premises included within the subsequent grant of 1846, and the patent of the United States, through which the-plaintiff claims. But the grant of 1845 was never presented to the authorities of the United States for recognition or confirmation. It is claimed, however, that it was a perfect grant and need not have been presented for con[429]*429firmation under the act of Congress referred to. Upon this point it is sufficient to say that the grant of 1845 appears never to have been approved by the Departmental Assembly during the Mexican domination in California, and it is settled that a grant lacking such approval is not a perfect or definitive grant. (Miller v. Dale, 44 Cal. 582; Chipley v. Farris, 45 Id. 527.)

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Etchemende v. Stearns
44 Cal. 582 (California Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Cal. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-escandon-cal-1875.