Taylor v. Cribb

26 S.E. 468, 100 Ga. 94, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 576
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 17, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 26 S.E. 468 (Taylor v. Cribb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Cribb, 26 S.E. 468, 100 Ga. 94, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 576 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. The bona fide holder for value of a negotiable promissory note who acquired title thereto before its maturity is entitled to enforce its collection against the maker, although the latter may have been induced to sign the note by means of false and fraudulent representations made by the original payee in the transaction which led to the giving of the note. Grooms v. Olliff, 93 Ga. 789.

2. The court was right in sustaining the certiorari, and there was no error in ordering a new trial in the magistrate’s court and in effect directing that upon the same state of facts there should be a finding in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affii'med.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moore v. Southern Discount Company
132 S.E.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Walters v. Palmer
36 S.E. 79 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Green v. Wilkie
36 L.R.A. 434 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 S.E. 468, 100 Ga. 94, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-cribb-ga-1896.