Taylor v. Cribb

26 S.E. 468, 100 Ga. 94, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 576
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 17, 1896·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. The bona fide holder for value of a negotiable promissory note who acquired title thereto before its maturity is entitled to enforce its collection against the maker, although the latter may have been induced to sign the note by means of false and fraudulent representations made by the original payee in the transaction which led to the giving of the note. Grooms v. Olliff, 93 Ga. 789.

2. The court was right in sustaining the certiorari, and there was no error in ordering a new trial in the magistrate’s court and in effect directing that upon the same state of facts there should be a finding in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment affii'med.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Cribb, 26 S.E. 468, 100 Ga. 94, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 576 (Ga. 1896).

26 S.E. 468 (Taylor v. Cribb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Southern Discount Company
132 S.E.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Walters v. Palmer
36 S.E. 79 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)
Green v. Wilkie
36 L.R.A. 434 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1896)