Taylor v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

4 A.3d 1041, 607 Pa. 151, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2152
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 21, 2010
DocketNo. 72 EM 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.3d 1041 (Taylor v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, 4 A.3d 1041, 607 Pa. 151, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2152 (Pa. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of September, 2010, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453 (1994) (hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward these filings to counsel of record. Within 60 days of this order, counsel of record is directed to present to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County a filing regarding Petitioner’s request for reinstatement nunc pro tunc of his appeal. Counsel’s filing shall either request nunc pro tunc relief or indicate why such relief will not be requested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.3d 1041, 607 Pa. 151, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-court-of-common-pleas-of-philadelphia-county-pa-2010.