Taylor v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC

• Court: District Court, M.D. Tennessee
• Decided: March 8, 2024
• Docket: 3:22-cv-00620
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JARVIS TAYLOR, ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) Case No. 3:22-cv-620 ) Judge Trauger/Frensley CORECIVIC OF TENNESSEE, LLC, _) et al., ) Defendants. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter 1s before the undersigned on review of the file. The Complaint herein was filed on August 16, 2022. Docket No. 1. The record does not reflect proof of service of summons and complaint on defendant O.1.C. f/n/u Borden within the time allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). For these reasons, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that defendant O.I.C. f/n/u Borden be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Rule 4(m). Under Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, any party has fourteen (14) days from receipt of this Report and Recommendation in which to file any written objections to this Recommendation with the District Court. Any party opposing said objections shall have fourteen (14) days from receipt of any objections filed in this Report in which to file any response to said objections. Failure to file specific objections within fourteen (14) days of receipt of this Report and Recommendation can constitute a waiver of further appeal of this Recommendation. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S. Ct. 466, 88 L. Ed. 2d 435 (1985), reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1111 (1986). IT IS SO ORDERED.