Taylor v. Corbett
This text of 269 A.D. 1010 (Taylor v. Corbett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (See Lang v. Wood, 92 F. 2d 211, certiorari denied 302 U. S. 686; Yaselli v. Goff, 8 F. 2d 161, affd. 12 F. 2d 396, certiorari granted 273 U. S. 677, affd. 275 U. S. 503; People v. Albany & Susquehanna B. B. Go., 57 N. T. 161; The People v. Brooklyn, F, é G. I. B. Go., 89 N. T. 75.) All concur. (One order dismisses plaintiff’s amended complaint and the other order denies plaintiff’s cross motion to compel service of an answer and. to strike out that complaint fails to constitute a cause of action in an action for damages for an alleged conspiracy.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCurn and Larkin, JJ. [See 270 App. Div. 799.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 1010, 59 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-corbett-nyappdiv-1945.