Taylor v. Cooke

388 So. 2d 1082, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23600
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 30, 1980
DocketNo. 79-2400
StatusPublished

This text of 388 So. 2d 1082 (Taylor v. Cooke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Cooke, 388 So. 2d 1082, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment below is affirmed with the sole exception of the provisions which declared the three named plaintiffs-appellees a legally cognizable class and accordingly assessed attorney’s fees against the defendant-appellant Taylor. None of the prerequisites for such a determination were present in this case. See, Frankel v. City of Miami Beach, 340 So.2d 463 (Fla.1976); Harrell v. Hess Oil and Chemical Corp., 287 So.2d 291, 293-94 (Fla.1973); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.220.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrell v. Hess Oil and Chemical Corporation
287 So. 2d 291 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Frankel v. City of Miami Beach
340 So. 2d 463 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 So. 2d 1082, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-cooke-fladistctapp-1980.