Taylor v. Cook

1 N.J.L. 54
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 15, 1791·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

If summon» is left agreeably to the directions of the party; he cannot take advantage ofits not being left at the place of his usual abode.

THE summons was left at the place where the defendant had told the Justice he resided, and directed him to have, any summons which might issue against him served. On a certiorari removing a judgment by default: The court refused to reverse the judgment, because the summons in fact was, not served at the defendant’s usual and real place of abode.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taylor v. Cook, 1 N.J.L. 54 (N.J. 1791).

1 N.J.L. 54 (Taylor v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hatch v. . R. R.
112 S.E. 529 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)