Taylor v. Commonwealth

2 Va. 94
CourtGeneral Court of Virginia
DecidedNovember 15, 1817
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Va. 94 (Taylor v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Commonwealth, 2 Va. 94 (Va. Super. Ct. 1817).

Opinion

This was an application for a Writ of Error to a judgment of the Superior Court of King George. The applicant was indicted for Earceny, as follows : “Virginia, King George county, to wit: The jurors for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in and for the county of King George, upon their oaths present, that Thomas Taylor, late of the parish of [151]*151in the said county of King- George, labourer, did, on the third day of October, in the year of our Cord, 1812, with force and arms, at the parish aforesaid, in the county aforesaid, one cow of a black color, of the price of $12, of the g-oods and chattels of one John G. Stuart, then and there being- found, feloniously did steal, take, and lead away, against the peace and dignity of the Commonwealth of Virginia.” "

The prisoner was convicted, and moved the said Court in arrest of judgment, for the following reasons: “1. Because the larceny in the Indictment mentioned is not expressly charged to have been committed within the jurisdiction of this Court;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Va. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-commonwealth-vagensess-1817.