Taylor v. Commissioners of Highways
This text of 2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 34 (Taylor v. Commissioners of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was a motion on the.part of the appellee to dismiss the appeal for want of a sufficient bond. Part of the appellants not being parties to the same and also a cross motion on the part of the appellants for leave to amend said bond, for the purpose of adding the parties, the motion to dismiss would be denied and the cross motion allowed, with an extension of time to the 9th inst., within which to make the proposed amendment.
NOTE.
See same case 88 Ill. 526. — Ed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-commissioners-of-highways-illcirct-1878.