Taylor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

95 F.2d 1018, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 84, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4334
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 17, 1938
DocketNo. 7478
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 F.2d 1018 (Taylor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 95 F.2d 1018, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 84, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4334 (6th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that, treating petitioner’s claims as claims for deductions from gross income because of “losses,” the petitioner has failed to carry the burden of proof that he sustained the losses or any portion thereof during the taxable years involved; and further, that treating the claims for deductions as “bad debts,” the petitioner has likewise failed to sustain the burden of proof that such claims or any portion thereof were ascertained to be worthless and were charged off within the taxable years involved, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Bryan Bros. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
127 F.2d 645 (Sixth Circuit, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 F.2d 1018, 21 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 84, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1938.