Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction

909 A.2d 524, 280 Conn. 926, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 415

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 16, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 772 (AC 26158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly remand the case to the habeas court for a finding of whether cause and [927]*927prejudice existed for the petitioner’s procedural default?”

Decided October 16, 2006 Melissa Streeto Brechlin, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Emmet P. Hibson, Jr., in opposition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17749.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 772 (AC 26158), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly remand the case to the habeas court for a finding of whether cause and [927]*927prejudice existed for the petitioner’s procedural default?”

Decided October 16, 2006 Melissa Streeto Brechlin, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Emmet P. Hibson, Jr., in opposition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17749.

Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction, 909 A.2d 524, 280 Conn. 926, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 415 (Colo. 2006).

Pincite

909 A.2d 524 (Taylor v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related