Taylor v. Cnty. of Pima
This text of 933 F.3d 1191 (Taylor v. Cnty. of Pima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judges Siler and Graber voted to deny the petitions for panel rehearing. Judge Schroeder voted to grant the petitions for panel rehearing. Judge Graber voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc, and Judge Siler so recommended. Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petitions for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The matter failed to receive a majority of votes of non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).
The petitions for panel rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
933 F.3d 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-cnty-of-pima-ca9-2019.