Taylor v. Clement

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Taylor v. Clement

110 So. 3d 199, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 996, 2013 WL 440142, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 180

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 6, 2013·No. No. 12-996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

AMY, Judge.

hFor the reasons expressed in the consolidated case of Susan Arrington v. ER [200]*200Physician Group, 12-995 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/13), 110 So.3d 193, the judgment of the trial court, rendered on June 18, 2012 is affirmed. The motion for en banc hearing is denied. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to the plaintiffs-appellants.

AFFIRMED. MOTION FOR EN BANC HEARING DENIED.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, specially concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AMY, Judge.

hFor the reasons expressed in the consolidated case of Susan Arrington v. ER [200]*200Physician Group, 12-995 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/13), 110 So.3d 193, the judgment of the trial court, rendered on June 18, 2012 is affirmed. The motion for en banc hearing is denied. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to the plaintiffs-appellants.

AFFIRMED. MOTION FOR EN BANC HEARING DENIED.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, specially concurs.

Taylor v. Clement, 110 So. 3d 199, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 996, 2013 WL 440142, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 180 (La. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

110 So. 3d 199 (Taylor v. Clement) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related