Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/Taylor v. Clement

Taylor v. Clement

110 So. 3d 199, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 996, 2013 WL 440142, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 180
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 6, 2013
DocketNo. 12-996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 So. 3d 199 (Taylor v. Clement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Taylor v. Clement, 110 So. 3d 199, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 996, 2013 WL 440142, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 180 (La. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinions

AMY, Judge.

hFor the reasons expressed in the consolidated case of Susan Arrington v. ER [200]*200Physician Group, 12-995 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/13), 110 So.3d 193, the judgment of the trial court, rendered on June 18, 2012 is affirmed. The motion for en banc hearing is denied. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to the plaintiffs-appellants.

AFFIRMED. MOTION FOR EN BANC HEARING DENIED.

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, specially concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arrington v. ER Physician Group, Inc.
110 So. 3d 193 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 So. 3d 199, 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 996, 2013 WL 440142, 2013 La. App. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-clement-lactapp-2013.